> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Remy Blank > Sent: 18 October 2011 20:55 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and > svnfs (and direct-svnfs)? > > Cooke, Mark wrote: > > * svn > > * svnfs > > These two are synonyms. It's what you should normally use. > I was wondering why we had two synonyms, I assumed something like 'svn' would use e.g. server based access (svn: or http:) whilst svnfs would use direct (file:) access (which seemed like it would be dangerous).
Does this require the post-commit changeset hook? > > * direct-svnfs > > This one bypasses the cache, so you don't need to resync Trac to the > repository, and changesets are picked up automatically. But it's also > much, much slower. > ...so this is the 0.11 method of checking the repository on every access (no hook required)? Many thanks, ~ mark c -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
