* Cooke, Mark <[email protected]> [2011-10-19 10:41]: > > These two are synonyms. It's what you should normally use. > > > I was wondering why we had two synonyms, I assumed something like 'svn' would > use e.g. server based access (svn: or http:) whilst svnfs would use direct > (file:) access (which seemed like it would be dangerous). > > Does this require the post-commit changeset hook?
Well, it does not require it. You can enable synchronizing on every request, but I would recommend against it. Solution with the hook is much more effective. > > > * direct-svnfs > > > > This one bypasses the cache, so you don't need to resync Trac to the > > repository, and changesets are picked up automatically. But it's also > > much, much slower. > > > ..so this is the 0.11 method of checking the repository on every access (no > hook required)? No. 0.11 was caching everything too, but it checked on every request if there is something new in the repository to be cached. direct-svnfs does not cache nothing, it always goes to the repository if it needs some info about it. -- greets silk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
