> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:58:21 PM UTC-5, ChiefEngr wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > I'm hoping to pick your collective brain before I > embark on this journey and make all sorts of bad choices. > > I'm thinking about rolling out somethng like Trac with > SVN to handle revision control (and whatever database engine > is the best way to go). I figure I'll also want Doxygen to > plug in to this so we can take advantage of what it brings to > the table. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] On Behalf Of Craig A > Sent: 15 August 2012 20:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Trac] Re: Share the Wisdom: What's better? Hosting > trac on Windows or Linux? > > Our team is doing all Windows development and we run Trac on > Windows 2008 R2 Apache + PostgreSQL (for our latest > deployment we used the Bitnami installer with wsgi) + > Subversion. We tried Mercurial and Git but found the polish > and feature set did not fit us well. We are in a corporate > setting and most of the advantages you see touted about DVCS > [1] aren't so important in a corporate setting. Our server is > always available, our users are in-house - the central model > works well for us. > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_revision_control
I agree with your comments on DVCS within a corporate environment. I would also add my vote to "the best server is the one you already know how to administer". We have had no significant issues with setting up Trac, subversion, PostgreSQL and apache (mod_wsgi) on Windows Server 2003 ~ I opted to install it all from scratch rather than use an installer so that I understand what is going on where (even though configuring mod_ldap was a PITA!) ~ mark c -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
