On 09.08.2013 18:15, RjOllos wrote:
Do you know of a good way that we can fix that print statement to also
print correctly in Python 3.x?
from __future__ import print_function is not available until Python 2.6.
How about?:
try:
print "Trac requires Python %d.%d or later" % min_python
except SyntaxError:
print("Trac requires Python %d.%d or later" % min_python)
Not yet tested, so Python 3.x syntax might not be exactly correct.
As long as no "advanced" features (like arguments) are used, I assume we
could simply use
print("Trac requires Python %d.%d or later" % min_python)
directly anyway, even without `from __future__ import print_function`.
All Python 2.x versions should still accept this as the old print
statement with (superfluous but harmless) parentheses around an expression.
http://python3porting.com/noconv.html#supporting-the-print-function
> The simple cases are not problematic, you can simply put parentheses
> around the text that should be printed. The following will print
> exactly the same in all versions of Python:
>
> >>> print("This works in all versions of Python!")
> This works in all versions of Python!
(For reference, I linked this thread in
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9595#comment:8 by the way.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
