On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:20 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:34:12 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:15:46 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:12:17 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 1:11:28 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:29:56 AM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 5:40:29 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:48:07 PM UTC-7, hasienda wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15.03.2014 17:55, ONeal Freeman wrote: 
>>>>>>>> > Good in theory but it did not work in my case since something 
>>>>>>>> during the 
>>>>>>>> > trac-admin upgrade command is wiping out some rather important db 
>>>>>>>> > fields. Now that's not to say that I do not have something 
>>>>>>>> > mis-configured. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is this 'something' that is worrying me. Granted that Trac 
>>>>>>>> upgrades 
>>>>>>>> are solid and reliable, million times tested process it is 
>>>>>>>> unlikely, 
>>>>>>>> that just you'll get hit by a flaw. Experiencing issues I would 
>>>>>>>> repeat 
>>>>>>>> the process with all plugins disabled/uninstalled and just upgrade 
>>>>>>>> Trac 
>>>>>>>> core, upgrade plugins later on, if required. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > This is my first dealing with Trac from this 
>>>>>>>> > prospective. Since I never got the tractickettemplateplugin to 
>>>>>>>> work I am 
>>>>>>>> > wondering if all of this is associated with the BitNami install 
>>>>>>>> of Trac. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing special with BitNami's stack as far as I know from using it 
>>>>>>>> two 
>>>>>>>> times on WinXP. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Again, I am a novice but I have definitely learned a lot. Please 
>>>>>>>> don't 
>>>>>>>> > take any of this wrong, I sincerely appreciate you guys helping 
>>>>>>>> me and 
>>>>>>>> > your assistance has gotten me this far. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure, you're welcome. Still i hope, that we'll finally get a clue, 
>>>>>>>> what 
>>>>>>>> is going on. Did we talk about DEBUG logs from upgrade process yet? 
>>>>>>>> Mysteries in code do not any good. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steffen Hoffmann 
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) 
>>>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> iEYEARECAAYFAlMkrnUACgkQ31DJeiZFuHdafACdGG8Kl+m8OtsnFNNV/mN2u4Mf 
>>>>>>>> 2YoAnjVbYgp3shiZQ0/J+DJzhEjorv1/ 
>>>>>>>> =6ehf 
>>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've tested with Bitnami Trac and can't reproduce the upgrade issue. 
>>>>>>> I think the only thing left is to look at the database in which the 
>>>>>>> upgrade 
>>>>>>> doesn't seem to have gone correctly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see now that my manual import of data into the trac.db has 
>>>>>> distorted the ticket descriptions formatting. Whereas in the original 
>>>>>> trac 
>>>>>> instance I had line feeds between the different sections the data import 
>>>>>> eliminated the line feeds and now the text is end to end like in notepad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steffen told me it was a bad idea to do a manual update. I just 
>>>>>> couldn't figure out another way to retrieve my time and timechange 
>>>>>> fields.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you tried using the trac.db file that I sent back to you? The 
>>>>> database appears to have been upgraded without any issues and you could 
>>>>> just discard that instance that you manually tweaked. 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I missed the db you sent. Never got any type of notification. 
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is strange. I received a notification when receiving the file you 
>>> sent, so I assumed you'd receive the same style notification.
>>>
>>> You should be able to access it here: 
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6br6SyRs711OG1sTjNjRXFYVmM/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems.  
>>>
>>
>> Downloaded the db. The same fields are still empty...
>>
>
> How did you determine that they are "empty"? I pulled the file off Google 
> drive, dropped it into a Trac 1.0.1 instance and they certainly aren't 
> empty. The ticket created, modified and change timestamps are displaying 
> correctly. There must be something else going on here.
>
> Viewing the table in SQLite Administrator. 

>
> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-vFgrLhpR48Y/UyduN_1QEdI/AAAAAAAABLw/52WgjaOIccE/s1600/Untitled.png>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to