On Monday, March 17, 2014 5:04:04 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote: > > > > On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:20 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:34:12 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 4:15:46 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote: >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:12:17 PM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 1:11:28 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:29:56 AM UTC-7, ONeal Freeman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 5:40:29 PM UTC-5, RjOllos wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:48:07 PM UTC-7, hasienda wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 15.03.2014 17:55, ONeal Freeman wrote: >>>>>>>>> > Good in theory but it did not work in my case since something >>>>>>>>> during the >>>>>>>>> > trac-admin upgrade command is wiping out some rather important >>>>>>>>> db >>>>>>>>> > fields. Now that's not to say that I do not have something >>>>>>>>> > mis-configured. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is this 'something' that is worrying me. Granted that Trac >>>>>>>>> upgrades >>>>>>>>> are solid and reliable, million times tested process it is >>>>>>>>> unlikely, >>>>>>>>> that just you'll get hit by a flaw. Experiencing issues I would >>>>>>>>> repeat >>>>>>>>> the process with all plugins disabled/uninstalled and just upgrade >>>>>>>>> Trac >>>>>>>>> core, upgrade plugins later on, if required. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > This is my first dealing with Trac from this >>>>>>>>> > prospective. Since I never got the tractickettemplateplugin to >>>>>>>>> work I am >>>>>>>>> > wondering if all of this is associated with the BitNami install >>>>>>>>> of Trac. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nothing special with BitNami's stack as far as I know from using >>>>>>>>> it two >>>>>>>>> times on WinXP. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > Again, I am a novice but I have definitely learned a lot. Please >>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>> > take any of this wrong, I sincerely appreciate you guys helping >>>>>>>>> me and >>>>>>>>> > your assistance has gotten me this far. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure, you're welcome. Still i hope, that we'll finally get a clue, >>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>> is going on. Did we talk about DEBUG logs from upgrade process >>>>>>>>> yet? >>>>>>>>> Mysteries in code do not any good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steffen Hoffmann >>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) >>>>>>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> iEYEARECAAYFAlMkrnUACgkQ31DJeiZFuHdafACdGG8Kl+m8OtsnFNNV/mN2u4Mf >>>>>>>>> 2YoAnjVbYgp3shiZQ0/J+DJzhEjorv1/ >>>>>>>>> =6ehf >>>>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've tested with Bitnami Trac and can't reproduce the upgrade >>>>>>>> issue. I think the only thing left is to look at the database in which >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> upgrade doesn't seem to have gone correctly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see now that my manual import of data into the trac.db has >>>>>>> distorted the ticket descriptions formatting. Whereas in the original >>>>>>> trac >>>>>>> instance I had line feeds between the different sections the data >>>>>>> import >>>>>>> eliminated the line feeds and now the text is end to end like in >>>>>>> notepad. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steffen told me it was a bad idea to do a manual update. I just >>>>>>> couldn't figure out another way to retrieve my time and timechange >>>>>>> fields. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you tried using the trac.db file that I sent back to you? The >>>>>> database appears to have been upgraded without any issues and you could >>>>>> just discard that instance that you manually tweaked. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I missed the db you sent. Never got any type of notification. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That is strange. I received a notification when receiving the file you >>>> sent, so I assumed you'd receive the same style notification. >>>> >>>> You should be able to access it here: >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6br6SyRs711OG1sTjNjRXFYVmM/edit?usp=sharing >>>> >>>> Let me know if you encounter any problems. >>>> >>> >>> Downloaded the db. The same fields are still empty... >>> >> >> How did you determine that they are "empty"? I pulled the file off Google >> drive, dropped it into a Trac 1.0.1 instance and they certainly aren't >> empty. The ticket created, modified and change timestamps are displaying >> correctly. There must be something else going on here. >> >> >> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-vFgrLhpR48Y/UyduN_1QEdI/AAAAAAAABLw/52WgjaOIccE/s1600/Untitled.png> >> Does the attached query return any results for you? >> > No, but I will assume that the query is just incorrect.
Have you tried putting the trac.db file I sent into your Trac instance? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
