On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 09:31 -0600, Russ Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:17:29 -0200
> Alain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Well, any interest in improving the Trac documentation is
> > > appreciated, but I'm concerned that this would lead to a lot of
> > > duplicated effort trying to maintain the online TracGuide as well
> > > as a separate book format.  Why not focus this effort on improving
> > > the TracGuid Wiki pages and then maybe we can look at ways to
> > > combine this information into a PDF format if a printable version
> > > would be useful.
> > 
> > It would be *very* interesting to have a tool to extract a complete 
> > manual from a Trac wiki. I am also interested in having something
> > like that: an online wiki manual that many people can write/modify
> > but that I could produce a pdf/paper version for distribution.

Yes, I think that this would be a nice idea, but I don't think that
there's any good way to automatically organize the web of Wiki pages
into a single linear document.  However, it may be possible to create a
WikiProcessor that would let you define a document outline based on the
page names and combine their contents into a single document from the
outline.

> It would actually probably be easier to store the sources in docbook
> format and create an xslt stylesheet to translate that into the Trac
> Wiki format.

Yes, but how do you convert the edited Wiki pages back into Docbook
format?

-- 
Matthew Good <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac

Reply via email to