John Hampton wrote:
Mattias Brändström wrote:

1. I had to install PyPgSQL to get it to work. The strange thing is that I get an error message saying that no module PyPgSQL could be found the first time I access trac after I have restarted it. The second time and every time after this I don't get this message. To get trac-admin to try and create a new environment I had to install PyPgSQL anyway.


Did you try with psycopg2? or just psycopg? I'm thinking I need to check which version of that patch is on trac-hacks.org. After I released it, I found a typo that made it not work with psycopg. I thought I had committed the fix, but I very well might not have.


I have only tried with psycopg, psycopg2 is not part of my Linux distribution (Ubuntu Dapper). I would like to as much as possible only install things with apt-get.

[snip]


Perhaps PgSchemaPatch is not supposed to work with 0.9.5? As I understand it the patch has been committed to the trunk, but it seems like asking for trouble to use that instead of a stable release.


Yes, it should work with 0.9.5, though I think 0.9.4 is the last stable release I tested with.

If you're using Gentoo, you can check out:

http://embassy.asylumware.com/projects/trac


And grab the overlay. The asylumware-trac ebuild is patched and known working. I'll try to make sure that trac-hacks.org is updated today.

Finally, the implementation in trunk is much nicer than that for 0.9.x. If you're not averse to running trunk, that I would says that it's not a bad choice.


OK. If I decide to run the trunk, is there some particular revision I should run or should I just check out HEAD? What I'm asking if is there is some revision that is more stable or do the trac developers try to only commit completed working features?

:.:: mattias

_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac

Reply via email to