Eric Smith added the comment: My spam filterer is MX Logic (now McAfee), for what it's worth.
> Do you (or any of the affected recipients) *in principle* *prefer* > having the From field contain the responsible developer? If not, > changing From to contain Reitveld is likely the best solution. I have no preference in principle. I'm just looking for some way to configure MX Logic to not treat Rietveld mail as spam. > How does your spam filterer handle Roundup messages? They have faked "From:" > too, but real address is specified in the "Sender:" header. Roundup messages are never marked as spam, that I've noticed, so I'm not sure how "Sender:" vs. "From:" affects MX Logic. Maybe using "Sender:" and "From:" like Roundup does causes it to not mark the messages as spam, or maybe Roundup messages just look less spammy (fewer links?). > I have no very strong opinion, but I prefer Roundup solution if it is > possible and works for you. That seems reasonable. > Personally I don't see a strong reason for having developers in the > From field. I slightly prefer having Reitveld as the From author, > with a citation to the responsible developer in the message body. But > that might just be me. :-) Same. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker <metatrac...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue554> _______________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tracker-discuss mailing list Tracker-discuss@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
