On 9/27/06, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote: > > On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Update to that last patch with exif enabled. > >> > >> On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Here's the patch for moving everything to tracker-extract. > >> > > >> > On 9/26/06, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > Edward Duffy wrote: > >> > > > Is there any advantage to keeping them internal? Should we just > >> stick > >> > > > with tracker-extract for all types? > >> > > > > > > > > ... > > I just reindexed all my files with an up-to-date CVS tracker, and the > > CPU usage skyrocketed to 90%. Is this possibly because all the > > extracting is done in tracker itself, so we lose things like nice -19? > > trackerd runs at nice +10 > > only text filters run at nice +19 > >
That's weird.. then how come it was hogging so much CPU? (I have about 200 GB of stuff, but the last time I indexed usage didn't go above 10% or so) > -- > Mr Jamie McCracken > http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
