Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote: > On 9/27/06, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote: >> > On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Update to that last patch with exif enabled. >> >> >> >> On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Here's the patch for moving everything to tracker-extract. >> >> > >> >> > On 9/26/06, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Edward Duffy wrote: >> >> > > > Is there any advantage to keeping them internal? Should we just >> >> stick >> >> > > > with tracker-extract for all types? >> >> > > >> > >> > >> > ... >> > I just reindexed all my files with an up-to-date CVS tracker, and the >> > CPU usage skyrocketed to 90%. Is this possibly because all the >> > extracting is done in tracker itself, so we lose things like nice -19? >> >> trackerd runs at nice +10 >> >> only text filters run at nice +19 >> >> > > That's weird.. then how come it was hogging so much CPU? (I have about > 200 GB of stuff, but the last time I indexed usage didn't go above 10% > or so) >
it should not hog cpu - if you dont have other process using cpu of course tracker will try and use it. we are doing stuff like zipping contents which is cpu intensive I guess. -- Mr Jamie McCracken http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
