On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Martyn Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27/10/09 12:53, Natan Yellin wrote: > >> Right, I understand why it would make sense for tracker to return >> default ontology data. I just don't understand why that data should ever >> be written back to the original file. (The only use that I understand- >> and disagree with- is to fix up filenames using Video Title.) >> > > Rather it is the other way round. Say you search for all videos in your > application and you show or sort by title. If there is no title (which can > happen on a phone or small device where the user just takes the picture and > never fills in a title) - the filename might be called > "2009-10-27-$location-$number.jpeg", So should that be used as the title in > the video? Otherwise apps that need this value have to deal with it not > existing too. This makes queries potentially complex. > OK, I see. > > -- > Regards, > Martyn >
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
