On 22/03/11 20:15, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Mikkel,
There's been some back and forth about Zeitgeist/Tracker integration. The key point in getting anything started in this direction is figuring out the ontology business.
Thanks for writing this email and sorry it has taken me a while to respond.
There has already been some work towards a solution[1]. We've already fixed a few issues reported by Rob a while back, but the changes in [1] were never discussed (see original ZG ontology in [2]). The problem is that Rob's work contains some changes that are incompatible with the original ontology, so it's not something we can adopt without justifying it (will break our API and bring some troublesome data migration work). So, let's get that discussion we never had :-) If we *theoretically* proposed the ZG ontology (as in [2], not [1]) for inclusion in Tracker, what issues would you see?
I think Philip has raised some good points. Where do we currently stand with all this? -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
