On 23 March 2011 10:28, Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 10:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: >> On 23 March 2011 00:12, Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > o. zg:hasSubject: must be nie:InformationElement as range >> >> Hmmm, right. Seems to make sense, although I think the reason it is >> like this is because some of the items in the Nepomuk ontologies are >> not always subclasses of nie:InformationElement, and we wanted to >> accomodate that. I can't recall the details off hand. > > Sound strange to me that you could have an event about something that > isn't a nie:InformationElement. Perhaps events about a nao:Tag?
Good call. I think nao:Tag was one of the reasons here in fact. It's not a huge deal - although we'd need a Tag class that was a nie:InformationElement if we ever wanted to log usage of tags, but we're not doing that now so that's hypothetical at this moment. -- Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
