I can't wait to see it!
 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Scott Miller
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 16:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [tracker2] Re: [opentracker] New weather station board


  

That includes the anemometer, wind vane, rain gauge, the mast, and all 
of the mounting hardware.

The enclosure is off-white ABS with mounting flanges. I'm considering 
just putting all of the external signals (PTT, RX audio, TX audio, RXD, 
TXD, power in, power out, squelch, ground) on a single screw terminal 
block on the bottom. A single DB9 won't be enough, and there's not a 
lot of room for multiple connectors.

Or maybe I'll add a vertical mount DB9 inside to make initial 
programming easier...

Scott

Fred Hillhouse wrote:
> 
> 
> Would that include the anemometer? Or just the interface to hook one up?
> 
> A lightning detector would be cool! I looked at the Boltek line awhile 
> back but the price kept me away.
> 
> Connecting it to a FC-301, batteries, solar panel, etc might have 
> possibilities.
> 
> Best regards,
> Fred
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* track...@yahoogroup <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com> s.com
[mailto:track...@yahoogroup <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com> s.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Scott Miller
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2009 15:42
> *To:* opentracker@ <mailto:opentracker%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
> *Cc:* track...@yahoogroup <mailto:tracker2%40yahoogroups.com> s.com
> *Subject:* [tracker2] Re: [opentracker] New weather station board
> 
> 
> 
> Yeah, it'll have serial output and will probably support Peet Bros
> format (and maybe at least one other) for compatibility with PC-based
> weather programs and such.
> 
> I've been pondering the 1-wire sensor thing. Solar is the main thing
> this would be missing, and maybe a lightning detector. But there are a
> LOT of 1-wire sensors out there, and supporting all of them in an
> embedded device is a lot harder than on a PC. I've got to balance the
> value of having support for some additional sensors against the burden
> of coding and testing support for them, and handling technical support
> for third-party devices.
> 
> Scott
> 
> .
> 
> 





Reply via email to