I just wanted to +1 releasing version 1.5, and then upgrading to Rails 2.0, and say hi to the rest of the list. I think it's wise to get the next rev of Tracks stable and out there before undertaking the work required to get on the next version of Rails, fun though that may be:)
On 10/1/07, BSAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1 Oct 2007, at 2:59, Luke Melia wrote: > > > Although this list has been quiet lately, the Trac and Subversion > > repository has not. We're moving along towards a 1.5 release of > > Tracks, and there are lots of new features and bug fixes in the trunk. > > > > The most significant is a cool statistics page helping you review > > your usage of Tracks. The statistics feature was written by Reinier > > Balt, a long time user of Tracks and champion bug reporter. > > Yes, a very nice feature! I love graphs :-) > > > I'm delighted to welcome Reinier as a new committer on Tracks. BSAG > > and I have also extended commit rights to Jacqui Maher and James > > Kebinger who have previously submitted good patches. Welcome and > > congrats to you three. > > Welcome all, and thanks for your contributions. > > > I just read through the description of changes in Rails 2.0, which > > is out in it's first preview release. (See http:// > > weblog.rubyonrails.com/2007/9/30/rails-2-0-0-preview-release) > > > > My question to the group is: should we upgrade to Rails 2.0 before > > the Tracks 1.5 release? > > I would also veer towards releasing 1.5, then upgrading to Rails 2.0, > unless: > > a) There are significant speed/efficiency improvements (as others > have mentioned) > b) Upgrading to 2.0 would require significant changes to users' > databases. As people will already have to do a bit of work up upgrade > their databases for 1.5, I don't want people to have to do it twice > in quick succession. > > cheers, > > bsag > > P.S. I apologise to everyone for being so slack about working on, > writing about or otherwise contributing to Tracks recently. Everyone > (particularly Luke) has being doing sterling work in my absence, but > I'm sorry not to have been more present. It has been a tough and very > busy year :-/ > > -- > but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek > http://www.rousette.org.uk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek > http://www.rousette.org.uk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
