Ok, I see your point. I may not agree with the actual decision, but I feel content knowing that this is the way people want it.
BR /Henrik On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 May 2009, at 19:55, Henrik Bohre wrote: > >> Ok, I think I understand now the reason behind the design decision, >> but when I am done with all actions in a context, I often like to see >> what's up next. I do think dependencies would lessen the need for >> this. >> >> What is your opinion about adding a collapsed-by-default "Deferred" >> section in the context view? Do you think it would clutter the UI too >> much? Or are there more cons with this approach? > > I think it would clutter things up too much. Often, I think that too much > visual clutter gets in the way of seeing what you need to work on now, and > can either be overwhelming, or result in you tinkering with the system too > much, rather than getting on with things. It will also make the page load > slower. > > cheers, > > bsag > > -- > but she's a girl - the weblog of a female geek > http://www.rousette.org.uk > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
