If someone wants it, let them maintain it. This can come across as rude/presumptuous, but it is what you have to do sometimes to let the project move forward.
Luis On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Tim Madden <[email protected]> wrote: > I use feed to put my tracks data in google calendar. I assume the atom > would work fine there... Go for it, so far as my usage is concerned. > > On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We've had a ticket to upgrade resource_feeder kicking around in our >> tracker for a while, and I finally got around to poking into it. As it turns >> out, resource_feeder is long dead, but there's now support in Rails itself >> for generating Atom feeds. Would anybody object to me re-writing the Tracks >> feeds to take advantage of this built-in Rails functionality, and in doing >> so getting rid of the RSS feeds entirely? Almost every feed reader (if not >> every single one) today supports both, and it would be one less plugin >> Tracks has to ship with. >> _______________________________________________ >> Tracks-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > > _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
