Thanks for the feedback! http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/1032-replace-resource_feeder-plugin-dependence-with-atom_feed_helper
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote: > If someone wants it, let them maintain it. This can come across as > rude/presumptuous, but it is what you have to do sometimes to let the > project move forward. > > Luis > > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Tim Madden <[email protected]> wrote: > > I use feed to put my tracks data in google calendar. I assume the atom > > would work fine there... Go for it, so far as my usage is concerned. > > > > On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> We've had a ticket to upgrade resource_feeder kicking around in our > >> tracker for a while, and I finally got around to poking into it. As it > turns > >> out, resource_feeder is long dead, but there's now support in Rails > itself > >> for generating Atom feeds. Would anybody object to me re-writing the > Tracks > >> feeds to take advantage of this built-in Rails functionality, and in > doing > >> so getting rid of the RSS feeds entirely? Almost every feed reader (if > not > >> every single one) today supports both, and it would be one less plugin > >> Tracks has to ship with. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tracks-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tracks-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
