On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, but rewriting stuff will delay 2.0 further. I am a bit alone here > :-) > I'm considering putting out 2.0RC for testing (using |) and changing the gui > for dependencies before rc2/final > > I did start hacking on an alternative. Perhaps you can look at it if it > feels ok.
I will try to check it out tomorrow. Luis > Reinier > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Luis Villa >> Verzonden: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 15:59 >> Aan: Reinier Balt >> CC: track-discuss >> Onderwerp: Re: [Tracks-discuss] tackling last 2.0 issue >> >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > The last big issue is >> > http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/975-todos-with-c >> > ommas- in-description-cannot-be-used-as-a-dependency >> > >> > I tracked the problem to the autocompleter that changes the input >> > field based on the separator (now: ","). >> > I like to fix this for 2.0 by using a separator that we disallow for >> > todo descriptions. (For 2.1 we can move towards a better solution with >> > some js >> > magic) >> > >> > Question is, what separator can we use that we disallow in todo >> > descriptions? I was thinking about "| " or "^ " >> >> | seems best to me, though really, it seems very hackish that we rely >> on this, and not db fields, but I'm not writing the code so I don't get to >> complain :) >> >> Luis > > _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
