Sorry for the late reply. I was/am swamped currently with work :-(

See below

Reinier

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected] [mailto:tracks-discuss-
> [email protected]] Namens Luis Villa
> Verzonden: woensdag 25 augustus 2010 18:39
> Aan: Tim Madden
> CC: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: tackling last 2.0 issue
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Tim Madden <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >  Got it.  That's what I figured.  I like your idea for a UI, however,
> > I can't say that the current UI is much of an itch that I want
> > scratched :)
> 
> I should probably make more explicit that I'm not a huge fan of the
proposed
> UI, because it isn't clear that 'Add' is tied to dependencies; to the
casual user

We could change add into a +

Or, we could change the autocomplete to add a todo automatically when you
select a todo from the autocomplete list. 
That way we do not need an add button at all. We will need to upgrade jQuery
for that to work.

> it would be easy to confuse this 'add' with the existing 'add action.' But
I
> admit I don't have any great proposals; the obvious one (moving 'add' next
to
> the text entry field, instead of under) would make it a very narrow field.

Hmm, I thought the add button was on the right of the text field?

> Making the text 'add dependency' would be at least somewhat better.
> Maybe also putting it all in a separately colored box to make it clear
that they
> were tied together? Something like:
> 
> --------------------------------------
> | (rest of the box)                  |
> |     -----------------------------    |
> |     | dependencies stuff  |    |
> |     |           [add deps]      |    |
> |     -----------------------------    |
> |                                            |
> |     [add action]                    |
> |                                            |
> --------------------------------------
> 
> HTH-
> Luis
> 
> > On 08/24/2010 04:09 AM, Reinier Balt wrote:
> >>
> >> You are correct. It is not wired up to the backend. I just hacked up
> >> the front-end to show adding and removing in the gui.
> >> Wiring that up takes considerable changes, so I like to know that
> >> this should be the way to go before I try to make the time :-)
> >>
> >> Reinier
> >>
> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >>> Van: [email protected]
> >>> [mailto:tracks-discuss- [email protected]] Namens Tim
> >>> Madden
> >>> Verzonden: maandag 23 augustus 2010 1:08
> >>> Aan: [email protected]
> >>> Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Re: tackling last 2.0 issue
> >>>
> >>>   I tried it out and deleted tracks.js and all.css.  I got the ui to
> >>> work
> >>
> >> for adding
> >>>
> >>> multiple dependencies, but the predecessor todo did not show that it
> >>> had a dependency with the little arrow as before...  I haven't had
> >>> much time to look at it so that is all i can report...
> >>>
> >>> On 08/22/2010 01:47 PM, Reinier Balt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Strange, the text field should have autocomplete. Are you running
> >>>> in
> >>>
> >>> development mode? If not, you probably neef to delete the all.js
> >>> file to regenerate?
> >>>>
> >>>> Reinier
> >>>>
> >>>> Op 22 aug. 2010 om 19:02 heeft Luis Villa<[email protected]>   het
> >>>> volgende
> >>>
> >>> geschreven:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Reinier Balt<[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I started on a quick ui mockup for adding and removing
> >>>>>> dependencies in a branch here:
> >>>>>> http://github.com/bsag/tracks/tree/dependency-ui
> >>>>>> Only the new-action form is modified and nothing will be saved yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hrm, I've checked it out, and see the 'add' button, but it isn't
> >>>>> behaving like I'd expect it to: no autocomplete in the entry
> >>>>> field, and I'm not sure what the difference is between 'add' under
> >>>>> the 'depends on' field, and 'add action' under the 'add' button?
> >>>>> And hitting 'add' doesn't seem to do anything :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am I doing something wrong?
> >>>>> Luis
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tracks-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to