Cool, I'll add it to Tracks as an example how to use the REST API for CLI
purposes. 
This will probably help people in the future too when we stop supporting
SOAP!

Reinier

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Vitalie Lazu [mailto:[email protected]]
> Verzonden: maandag 29 augustus 2011 9:35
> Aan: Reinier Balt
> CC: 'Sebastian Fischmeister'; [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Re: [Tracks-discuss] Two features / donation
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Dum 28 Aug 2011, Reinier Balt wrote:
> > Nice, I was not aware of the script by Vitalie. If Vitalie agrees, we
> > could fold that gist into tracks master.
> >
> > Reinier
> No problems, I updated gist today to work with https protocol.
> 
> https://gist.github.com/45537
> 
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:tracks-discuss- [email protected]] Namens
> > > Sebastian Fischmeister
> > > Verzonden: zaterdag 27 augustus 2011 17:01
> > > Aan: [email protected]
> > > Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Two features / donation
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >   I'm interested in using tracks. The main reasons are that I can
> > > host it
> >
> > myself,
> >
> > > it looks good, and it's a web-based solution. Having used GTD for
> > > some
> >
> > while,
> >
> > > this is what I'm missing in tracks.
> > >
> > > 1) Sequential & parallel projects (taken from OmniFocus). A parallel
> >
> > project
> >
> > > defines that all actions can be done anytime. It's essentially what
> > > tracks currently assumes when 'depends on' is undefined. A
> > > sequential project means that every action depends on the action
> > > listed before. So if you
> >
> > have
> >
> > > Action 1
> > > Action 2
> > > Action 3
> > >
> > > this implicitly means that Action 2 depends on Action 1.
> > >
> > > Sequential projects are useful, because it keeps the list of
> > > available
> >
> > actions
> >
> > > short and one can quickly enter the list of actions (without going
> > > through
> >
> > the
> >
> > > depends on; albeit the autocomplete).
> > >
> > > 2) A CLI or pure textbox interface for adding actions with project,
> >
> > contexts,
> >
> > > due dates, and notes. There was one [1], however, I'm unsure whether
> > > it's still working with tracks 2.0. The CLI would permit a lot of
> > > scripting
> >
> > capabilities
> >
> > > outside tracks such as using templates and checklists. If one were
> > > to integrate it into tracks, it would look like the quick-add field
> > > you can
> >
> > find in
> >
> > > mgsd.
> > >
> > > I can offer a cash donation (I paid for other gtd software, so I see
> > > the
> >
> > value)
> >
> > > or a PPC-based G4 macbook (I know it's old, but that's why I can
> > > donate
> >
> > it)
> >
> > > for the project. Any comments?
> > >
> > >   Sebastian
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.getontracks.org/forums/viewthread/319/
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Vitalie
> WWW: http://www.webng.md

_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to