If someone wants to pick that one up, I'll merge it. I think we need to add drag-and-drop reordening of todos too, in order to manage sequential projects, so that makes it a bit more complex.
In the meantime, you can use the current dependencies feature to manage sequential projects. Reinier Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Sebastian Fischmeister Verzonden: dinsdag 30 augustus 2011 15:09 Aan: Reinier Balt CC: Vitalie Lazu; Sebastian Fischmeister; [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: Two features / donation What about the sequential and parallel projects idea? Any feedback? On Monday, August 29, 2011, Reinier Balt <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool, I'll add it to Tracks as an example how to use the REST API for CLI > purposes. > This will probably help people in the future too when we stop supporting > SOAP! > > Reinier > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: Vitalie Lazu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Verzonden: maandag 29 augustus 2011 9:35 >> Aan: Reinier Balt >> CC: 'Sebastian Fischmeister'; [email protected] >> Onderwerp: Re: [Tracks-discuss] Two features / donation >> >> Hello, >> >> On Dum 28 Aug 2011, Reinier Balt wrote: >> > Nice, I was not aware of the script by Vitalie. If Vitalie agrees, we >> > could fold that gist into tracks master. >> > >> > Reinier >> No problems, I updated gist today to work with https protocol. >> >> https://gist.github.com/45537 >> >> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> > > Van: [email protected] >> > > [mailto:tracks-discuss- [email protected]] Namens >> > > Sebastian Fischmeister >> > > Verzonden: zaterdag 27 augustus 2011 17:01 >> > > Aan: [email protected] >> > > Onderwerp: [Tracks-discuss] Two features / donation >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I'm interested in using tracks. The main reasons are that I can >> > > host it >> > >> > myself, >> > >> > > it looks good, and it's a web-based solution. Having used GTD for >> > > some >> > >> > while, >> > >> > > this is what I'm missing in tracks. >> > > >> > > 1) Sequential & parallel projects (taken from OmniFocus). A parallel >> > >> > project >> > >> > > defines that all actions can be done anytime. It's essentially what >> > > tracks currently assumes when 'depends on' is undefined. A >> > > sequential project means that every action depends on the action >> > > listed before. So if you >> > >> > have >> > >> > > Action 1 >> > > Action 2 >> > > Action 3 >> > > >> > > this implicitly means that Action 2 depends on Action 1. >> > > >> > > Sequential projects are useful, because it keeps the list of >> > > available >> > >> > actions >> > >> > > short and one can quickly enter the list of actions (without going >> > > through >> > >> > the >> > >> > > depends on; albeit the autocomplete). >> > > >> > > 2) A CLI or pure textbox interface for adding actions with project, >> > >> > contexts, >> > >> > > due dates, and notes. There was one [1], however, I'm unsure whether >> > > it's still working with tracks 2.0. The CLI would permit a lot of >> > > scripting >> > >> > capabilities >> > >> > > outside tracks such as using templates and checklists. If one were >> > > to integrate it into tracks, it would look like the quick-add field >> > > you can >> > >> > find in >> > >> > > mgsd. >> > > >> > > I can offer a cash donation (I paid for other gtd software, so I see >> > > the >> > >> > value) >> > >> > > or a PPC-based G4 macbook (I know it's old, but that's why I can >> > > donate >> > >> > it) >> > >> > > for the project. Any comments? >> > > >> > > Sebastian >> > > >> > > [1] http://www.getontracks.org/forums/viewthread/319/ >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Vitalie >> WWW: http://www.webng.md > >
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
