>>>>> In <[email protected]> >>>>> Ted Zlatanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:45:04 +0900 Daiki Ueno <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - save /imap:blockstar.com:/INBOX.test/new via tramp-imap-put-file (uses > >> PGG) > >> - read /imap:blockstar.com:/INBOX.test/new via tramp-imap-get-file (uses > >> PGG)
DU> I think this (implicit encryption) is a misdesgined feature which should DU> be removed. Why don't you leave the job to auto-encryption-mode so that DU> a user can choose whether to encrypt a file by adding ".gpg"? > Unlike filesystems, IMAP servers are a semi-public space, Really? I use 3 IMAP servers for everyday use and they properly implement access control like file systems. In other words, no one can read my private emails unless s/he shares the passphrase with me. Otherwise, it's a horrible situation... > in the sense that the vast majority of the users can't expect security > or privacy beyond what the server administrators and owners are > willing to grant. Very, very few users actually own and control their > IMAP servers. Thus, encrypting by default is IMHO the best option and > the only one I provided in this initial version. I think you always lack "use-case analysis". Regards, -- Daiki Ueno _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
