Michael Albinus <[email protected]> writes:
>
> (Somehow, I failed to read your second diff. Sorry for that)
The third part too below? I don't think the defadvice should change the
return value for non-tramp names.
Actually "(list name)" seems doubtful in the tramp cases too. If
there's no matches I think the return should be nil, not the pattern.
But I say that without trying it, and without knowing if it's a hack to
keep the pattern for later action ...
2009-11-15 Kevin Ryde <[email protected]>
* tramp.el (defadvice file-expand-wildcards): For non-tramp names
don't change the return to (list name), leave per the original.
--- tramp.el.~2.748.~ 2009-11-15 10:51:30.000000000 +1100
+++ tramp.el 2009-11-15 10:55:28.000000000 +1100
@@ -8376,9 +8376,7 @@
(setq ad-return-value (list name))))
(setq ad-return-value (list name)))
;; If it is not a Tramp file, just run the original function.
- ad-do-it
- (unless ad-return-value
- (setq ad-return-value (list name))))))
+ ad-do-it)))
(add-hook
'tramp-unload-hook
(lambda ()
_______________________________________________
Tramp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
