Toru TSUNEYOSHI <[email protected]> writes: >> Nice idea. However, Tramp is copylefted by the FSF. As a result, >> non-trivial contributions could be accepted only in case the author >> (you) has signed the corresponding legal FSF papers. Have you done this >> already? Or would you be willing to do? > > I have done it for Emacs already. > It is valid for tramp, isn't it? > If invalid, I will do it for tramp again.
Here I am a little bit lost. It is possible to sign papers for both Tramp and Emacs. Regular committers for Tramp have done both. OTOH, there are (non-trivial) changes of Tramp in the Emacs repository, which I take over into the Tramp repository, without asking, whether the submitter has signed papers for Tramp. Having papers just for Emacs might be sufficient. (I add the licensing clerk of the FSF in Cc, in case there are other opinions.) So I will do in your case :-) However, if it is not a burden for you, you might ask FSF also for papers with respect to Tramp. I will check your patch next days, and comment. Best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
