Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vauc...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello,
Hi Philippe, > The discussion eventually resulted with someone making a lot of > suggestions on how TRAMP should be, what was done "wrong" in it, etc. > When suggested to communicate upstream, the person was not interested > at all but showed a paste of custom hacks with comments suggesting > areas where TRAMP could be improved... I kept this paste aside and I > fell on it today so I'm sending it, in the hope it helps improving > TRAMP. Thanks for this! > I know the tone of the paste is not very constructive, please try to > see past it and focus on the ideas/leads mentionned instead. No problem. It's not the first time I'm flamed because of Tramp ... > Here is the paste: http://sprunge.us/NGJM?cl > > Maybe some or all of these comments are not relevant anymore, maybe > the ideas are not really good ideas after all, or maybe it'd be too > much work to implement some of the ideas... but I thought that it's > for emacs-devel to decide. > > If there are ideas worth considering, it's probably a good idea to > start new threads for each ideas, assuming they need somewhat deep > discussions. I will go through case by case. After a first look, some of the problems are fixed indeed, some other comments need more investigation. I have added also <tramp-devel@gnu.org>, since this is the primary discussion list for Tramp issues. > Kind regards, > Philippe Best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tramp-devel mailing list Tramp-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tramp-devel
