"Andrey Portnoy" <aport...@fastmail.com> writes: Hi Andrey
>> That's all for now :-) > > Thank you for your notes, I'll look for a solution. Will try to send > something out soon. Thanks! Last night, I had a further idea. What if we say that tramp-remote-path values nil and '(tramp-own-remote-path) are equal? No settings, no checks. Otherwise, a value of nil would behave like '(tramp-own-remote-path), no settings and no checks. But an explicit value of '(tramp-own-remote-path) would result in settings and checks. That sounds inconsistent. Going further this line, we wouldn't need the value nil anymore except for convenience. WDYT? Best regards, Michael.
