Michael Albinus <michael.albi...@gmx.de> writes: Hi Andrey,
> You still focus on tramp-set-remote-path. As said in my last message, we > need also to touch tramp-get-re mote-path. > > Have you tested (exec-path) with your patches in play? I didn't, but I > elieve we need to do something here as well. Meanwhile, I believe we're miscommunicating. You still want to suppress checks for double entries in tramp-remote-path, and whether a remote directory exists. My approach is different. When tramp-remote-path is '(tramp-own-remote-path), I intend to check nothing, and to set NOTHING. The remote $PATH is already proper per definition. WDYT? Best regards, Michael.
