On 26/02/14 13:33, Carl Wallace wrote: >>> >>> While I agree that lack of a CA certificate with the matching naming >>> really doesn¹t matter, breaking name chaining seems like an odd way to >>> maintain ³ritual compliance". Why not bump the version number instead? >>> v4 could be defined as a pre-certificate containing a poison extension >>> and >>> a serial number that matches its v3 counterpart. >> >> Hi Carl. I briefly discussed the idea of changing the version number >> with Ben a few months ago... > > Sorry for the rehash. There are occasions where I miss an email in this > list:-)
No need to apologize. It was an off-list discussion. :-) -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
