On 2/24/14 12:12 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > Whether or not these is time at the meeting, I suggest this is a > discussion we continue on therightkey because I have a feeling that > Melinda is going to kick us out pretty quick if we get into discussion > of approaches. I would kick me out.
We have a very short session scheduled in London, and I feel pretty strongly about IETF meetings as working meetings. As for relevance, right now therightkey is the best place for discussion of other approaches to fixing PKI, while trans is specifically for discussion of certificate transparency. The only thing that's in our charter at the moment is 6962bis. That doesn't mean that other applications of CT are out-of- scope, but that we'd need to recharter to take them on as work items. It's a bit early for that. Probably the best way to keep these proposals alive is to get internet drafts posted. I'd like to stay focused on getting 6962bis done, but won't stomp on discussion of other CT applications unless they take over the mailing list. And otherwise I am completely agnostic on the question of whether those discussions happen here or on therightkey. Melinda _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
