On 11/03/14 12:40, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
<snip>
    Phill, are you assuming that "<log server>" can't have a "/" in it?
      If so, that's an invalid assumption.

    The values of "<log server>" for the 2 CT Logs that Google are
    currently operating are "ct.googleapis.com/pilot" and
    "ct.googleapis.com/aviator".


Problem with that approach is that it means that each log deployment
requires server admin to create the distribution point and isn't
compatible with the .well-known convention.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785#section-1.1 says...
  "Well-Known URIs...are designed to facilitate
   discovery of information on a site when it isn't practical to use
   other mechanisms;"

TLS Clients such as Chrome are going to embed lists of the URIs of the CT Logs that they trust. "Discovery" of CT Logs is not a requirement. In other words, it _is_ practical to use other mechanisms.

Do you think log discovery will be needed for some other potential use-case(s) for public notary transparency (that this WG might one day be re-chartered to tackle)?

--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to