On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since a 6962-bis already exists > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/) it > would be better to comment on that. But I think all these comments > apply anyway. > > On 10 March 2014 20:58, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 4) sha256_root_hash. > > > > Really? This should be an object that has an algorithm/data pair. > Encoding > > the algorithm into the tag is going to make algorithm agility hard. > > I agree about the name. Not sure I agree about agility. We don't think > a log can change algorithm partway through - at least, we don't think > we want to specify how. > > If you want a new algorithm, you start a new log. But the digest algorithm has to be specified somewhere. Or how does the client discover what it is? -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
