On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Tao Effect <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Nico for at least noting it. ;-)
That's all I'll do for now. I don't have time to engage your position at this time. Surely others already have anyways. > This list is about making CT happen, and here I come saying that CT is a Right. > horrible and insecure protocol. Maybe. > Such a civil reply is almost unexpected. ^_^ By "noted" I meant to say that yes, I took note of your position but I don't want to discuss that topic in the context of "DNSSEC needs CT" -- the two matters are separable. To discuss your response in the same thread would just create noise. At any rate, I don't have time to address it separately anyways. Feel free to educate us though. Nico -- _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
