Hi Melinda, > Right now there's a proposal to look at the possibility of > applying CT to DNSSEC. A general discussion of "the worthiness of > DNSSEC and PKI" doesn't really go to that proposal.
Understood! (FTR, I didn't come up with that subject title. ^_^) > We kept the [email protected] mailing list around for discussions > of just this nature, and I'd be grateful if you could keep the > discussion here focused on the applicability of CT to DNSSEC and > take the more general discussion over there. Pointing out security and design flaws in CT is off-topic, noted, thanks. Kind regards, Greg -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
