On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 July 2014 17:13, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote: >> During the session last week I was a bit surprised by the number of >> people saying that they were doing implementations, and I think it >> might be useful to get a better handle on that. If nothing else, it >> helps quite a bit during the publication process if it's known >> that there are interoperable implementations and that we know a little >> bit about them. >> >> So, I'd be grateful if people who've are working on implementations >> and who can discuss them publicly could speak up, let us know the >> status and whether or not you'll be releasing source, and provide a >> pointer to a repo or other documentation if you're able. Also let >> me know whether or not you'd be willing to have your implementation >> mentioned on a wiki page listing implementations. > > Obviously(?) Google has an open source implementation here: > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency.
My understanding is that this is only an implementation of a CT log, am I correct ? > We also have two internal production implementations, both of which > share as much code as is feasible with the open source. No current > plan to release source that is not already released. > > Feel free to mention them on a wiki page. > >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Melinda >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trans mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
