trans  

Messages by Date

• 2017/05/15 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Eran Messeri
• 2017/05/15 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS Richard Barnes
• 2017/05/12 [Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/12 [Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS Brian Smith
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Brian Smith
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCT trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2` trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client section trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/12 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH age trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/11 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/11 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate" trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/11 Re: [Trans] Ticket 170 Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/11 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys? trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/11 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/11 [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/10 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate" trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/10 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys? trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/10 Re: [Trans] Ticket 170 Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/10 [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] Ticket 170 Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] Ticket 170 Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad) Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Tom Ritter
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 [Trans] Ticket 170 Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate" trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate" trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys? trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys? trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/09 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] What logs are storing Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad) Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/08 [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad) Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Linus Nordberg
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Tom Ritter
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/08 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Brian Smith
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] Ticket 179 - moving Cert/Precert indicator into the data structure Rob Stradling
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Rob Stradling
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #186: Add a registry for error codes trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #166: State the log parameters in the section that defines a log trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190 trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190 trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #183: Don't violate the TLS Feature extension definition trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #180: Consolidate all Merkle tree data formats and computations trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #172: Pick one structure for multiple TransItems trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #173: De-duplicate Extension types trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #171: Simplify Log IDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #169: Don't guess at STHs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #168: Remove STH from `get-entries` response trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #165: Remove unnecessary operational restrictions on logs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #163: The entire STH history of the log must be accessible trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Brian Smith
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/05 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/04 [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad Brian Smith
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Nick Sullivan
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Nick Sullivan
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints Richard Barnes
• 2017/05/04 [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Ticket 179 - moving Cert/Precert indicator into the data structure Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis) Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #163: The entire STH history of the log must be accessible trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #160: New get-sths API for fetching all STHs in a given time range trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #174: Remove use of `digitally-signed`? trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #180: Consolidate all Merkle tree data formats and computations trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #169: Don't guess at STHs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #165: Remove unnecessary operational restrictions on logs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190 trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #163: The entire STH history of the log must be accessible trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190 trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #165: Remove unnecessary operational restrictions on logs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/04 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 [Trans] Ticket 179 - moving Cert/Precert indicator into the data structure Eran Messeri
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] Removal of STH from get-entries response Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #169: Don't guess at STHs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #168: Remove STH from `get-entries` response trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] Removal of STH from get-entries response Melinda Shore
• 2017/05/03 [Trans] Removal of STH from get-entries response Andrew Ayer
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #168: Remove STH from `get-entries` response trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #188: Specify an empty consistency proof for equal tree sizes trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #171: Simplify Log IDs trans issue tracker
• 2017/05/03 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #188: Specify an empty consistency proof for equal tree sizes trans issue tracker
• 2017/04/25 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #162: Bound the set of artifacts a log is expected to produce trans issue tracker
• 2017/04/20 [Trans] Minutes from IETF 98 uploaded Melinda Shore
• 2017/04/17 [Trans] trans - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 99 "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"
• 2017/04/17 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-11.txt internet-drafts
• 2017/04/10 Re: [Trans] Privacy-preserving proof of sct exclusion Saba Eskandarian
• 2017/04/10 Re: [Trans] Privacy-preserving proof of sct exclusion George Tankersley
• 2017/04/10 Re: [Trans] RFC 7320 and draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-24 Melinda Shore
• 2017/04/07 Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #51: Test, please disregard trans issue tracker
• 2017/04/07 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Merging the STH and SCT extension types (issue 173) Richard Barnes
• 2017/04/07 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Merging the STH and SCT extension types (issue 173) Richard Barnes
• 2017/04/07 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Merging the STH and SCT extension types (issue 173) Rob Stradling
• 2017/04/06 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Merging the STH and SCT extension types (issue 173) Ben Laurie
• 2017/04/06 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Merging the STH and SCT extension types (issue 173) Rob Stradling
• 2017/04/06 Re: [Trans] 6962-bis: Getting rid of SCTWithProofDataV2 (issue 172) Rob Stradling
• 2017/04/06 [Trans] 6962-bis: Getting rid of SCTWithProofDataV2 (issue 172) Eran Messeri
• 2017/04/05 Re: [Trans] Privacy-preserving proof of sct exclusion Saba Eskandarian
• 2017/04/04 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Tony Finch
• 2017/04/03 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Paul Wouters
• 2017/03/30 [Trans] Internet-Level Consensus bar BoF tonight 7:30pm, Amuse David Mazieres
• 2017/03/29 Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/29 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Viktor Dukhovni
• 2017/03/29 Re: [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency Ben Laurie
• 2017/03/28 [Trans] Mozilla's basic take on Binary Transparency Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/28 Re: [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/27 [Trans] STH Pollination Implementations Andrew Ayer
• 2017/03/27 Re: [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Andrew Ayer
• 2017/03/26 Re: [Trans] Privacy-preserving proof of sct exclusion Saba Eskandarian
• 2017/03/25 [Trans] Privacy-preserving proof of sct exclusion Saba Eskandarian
• 2017/03/23 Re: [Trans] [EXT] CT Log Costs and Incentives Devon O'Brien
• 2017/03/23 [Trans] Slides! Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/23 Re: [Trans] [EXT] CT Log Costs and Incentives Tarah Wheeler
• 2017/03/23 [Trans] CT Log Costs and Incentives Steve Matsumoto
• 2017/03/22 Re: [Trans] [EXT] Re: Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Tarah Wheeler
• 2017/03/22 Re: [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/22 Re: [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/22 Re: [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/22 [Trans] Proposal to modularize pre certificate transformation Tarah Wheeler
• 2017/03/21 Re: [Trans] CT for DNSSEC Paul Wouters
• 2017/03/20 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Viktor Dukhovni
• 2017/03/20 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Wei Chuang
• 2017/03/18 Re: [Trans] CT for DNSSEC Linus Nordberg
• 2017/03/17 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/17 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Viktor Dukhovni
• 2017/03/17 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Paul Hoffman
• 2017/03/17 Re: [Trans] CT for DNSSEC Linus Nordberg
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] [dane] CT for DNSSEC Paul Hoffman
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] Gossip URL version Andrew Ayer
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] Gossip URL version Linus Nordberg
• 2017/03/16 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Rob Stradling
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Fresh issues! Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/15 [Trans] Fresh issues! Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Gossip URL version Kurt Roeckx
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Gossip URL version Andrew Ayer
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] RFC 7320 and draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-24 Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/15 Re: [Trans] Gossip URL version Linus Nordberg
• 2017/03/15 [Trans] RFC 7320 and draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-24 Martin Thomson
• 2017/03/15 [Trans] Gossip URL version Kurt Roeckx
• 2017/03/13 Re: [Trans] Experiment report: The MMD is a lie Linus Nordberg
• 2017/03/09 [Trans] Talk announcement: Internet-Level Consensus is Practical David Mazieres
• 2017/03/09 Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/09 Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/09 Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/09 Re: [Trans] Draft agenda Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/09 [Trans] Draft agenda Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/08 Re: [Trans] Non-redaction options Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/08 Re: [Trans] Non-redaction options Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/07 [Trans] Non-redaction options Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/07 [Trans] Upcoming meeting Melinda Shore
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] STH Discipline & Security Considerations Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] STH Discipline & Security Considerations Ben Laurie
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/07 Re: [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Rob Stradling
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/06 [Trans] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-04.txt Xialiang (Frank)
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/06 [Trans] White out (was Re: Reviving Redaction) Rob Stradling
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Jeremy Rowley
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Rob Stradling
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Ryan Sleevi
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Rob Stradling
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Eric Mill
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] STH Discipline & Security Considerations Richard Barnes
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Andrew Ayer
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Salz, Rich
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/06 Re: [Trans] Reviving Redaction Salz, Rich
• 2017/03/05 [Trans] Reviving Redaction Peter Bowen
• 2017/03/03 [Trans] trans - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 98 "IETF Secretariat"

• Earlier messages
• Later messages