On 13/03/15 20:25, Stephen Farrell wrote: <snip>
And if we interpret 5280 strictly and conclude that is still a good plan then the question would be what to do about the SCT encoding, which could be to do something hacky like prepending another OCTET STRING tag and a length I suppose,
Stephen, RFC6962 does precisely that, and the current 6962-bis text aims to do the same.
Adding yet another OCTET STRING would turn it into an OCTET STRING inside an OCTET STRING inside an OCTET STRING!
I'd be surprised if Russ or Steve Kent would consider that to be any better than the current plan (an OCTET STRING inside an OCTET STRING).
-- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
