Ben,

Thanks for the review. Addressing some issues below and others in a
separate reply to Tom's comments.


Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote
Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:51:38 -0400 (EDT):

| I seem to be missing a normative reference for various terminology and
| conventions (e.g., "the timestamp, as a number", which I assume is
| milliseconds since the epoch, excluding leap seconds, in decimal, to match
| the other specs).

They are all from RFC6962. What'd be the right way of refer to it?
Mentioning 6962 in each and every entry, like

         +  sct_version - Version as defined in [RFC6962] Section 3.2,
            as a number.

         +  log_id - LogID as defined in [RFC6962] Section 3.2, as a
            base64 encoded string.

or rather put some text at the top of the section (3.1.3. in this case)?


| The formatting in 4.1.3 seems funky; it looks like a list has been
| condensed into running text (including bullet symbols)

Would capitalizing the first word of each point be sufficient or should
we get rid of the list altogether?

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to