Hi Melinda,
I am sorry but I disagree. This should have been fixed long time ago -
no Google private OIDs should have been put in a WG document in the
first place.
Cheers,
Max
On 3/27/15 7:03 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 3/27/15 6:43 PM, Massimiliano Pala wrote:
last consideration about the I-D - there are a bunch of OID values that
are used throughout the document that are using PRIVATE (Google) OIDs in
the document - this is *completely wrong*! Private OIDs should not be
used for I-Ds.
It's fine while the document is in development. New OIDs
will be requested before the document exits wg last call, but
it's one of a number of things in a draft that changes as
the document progresses. You're correct that the IANA
considerations section will need to be updated, though.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
