> I am sorry but I disagree. This should have been fixed long time ago - no
> Google private OIDs should have been put in a WG document in the first
> place.

Are you also bothered by the OID's in CMS S/MIME and other pkcs-derived RFC's?

At any rate,  Russ has already responded on the issue of existing OID's: leave 
as-is to avoid confusion and disrupting implementations.

        /r$

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to