#79: Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate
Comment (by [email protected]): OK, I agree that option 2 is what the I-D already proposes. However, in the interest of helping implementers to avoid missing this requirement, I suggest we add a note to -bis along the lines of... "Note that RFC5652 requires a content-type attribute and a message-digest attribute to be included in signedAttrs." -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: blocker | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/79#comment:5> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
