what does it mean to not be "an X509 signature"?

I thought the intent was to use a CMS object, and thus the signature
would be defined by that (profiled) CMS object.
#79: Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the
TBSCertificate

Changes (by [email protected]):

  * milestone:   => review


Comment:

  After discussion with Rob, core point is that the CMS signature is not an
  X509 signature.

  Fixed at https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-
  rfcs/commit/546e6e9451186e96ddd7b54ca02f17c8d86f951e.


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to