On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Stephen Kent wrote:

I also agree that the architecture document provides a more in-depth
description of the Monitor function, but it is also at odds with the
description in the -11 draft. So, I disagree with the proposal to
leave the current text in place.

Then please provide improved text (not scaffolding) for the bis document.

Paul

 #93: Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4

 Changes ([email protected]):

   * owner:[email protected]  =>
       [email protected]
   * milestone:   => review


 Comment:

   I believe this is now addressed more in-depth by the architecture
   document, so I propose leaving the current text in-place (which was
   improved when Rob Stradling re-hauled the clients section).


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to