Looking at the change history it seems some of your suggested text was adopted into section 9.4: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-12#section-9.4
Auditing is now described as a separate function, independent of a Monitor. Algorithms used to verify consistency of STHs and inclusion of certificates are also clearly laid-out. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > Eran, > > I would like to see auditing described as a separate function, independent > of a Monitor. > My recollection (after being on vacation for 3 weeks) was that this > distinction was > OK in the intro, then muddled in the discussion of the Monitor, which was > described in > a way that made it an auditor. I provided text to try to fix this. I'm not > sure if you > are saying that the text I provided does not address the problem, or that > you and your > co-authors have rejected that text and are unable to generate alternative > text to address > the concern I cited. > > Steve > > > Risking resurrection of an old thread, I'll point out that when addressing > ticket 141 > <https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/117/files> > more text was added about auditing, which should clarify what a monitor can > do if it's interested in auditing. > Ticket 118 <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/118> seems to > repeat the concern originally raised in ticket 93, but we couldn't come up > with text that would be meaningful and address the concern raised in that > ticket. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, Stephen Kent wrote: >>> >>> I also agree that the architecture document provides a more in-depth >>>> description of the Monitor function, but it is also at odds with the >>>> description in the -11 draft. So, I disagree with the proposal to >>>> leave the current text in place. >>>> >>> >>> Then please provide improved text (not scaffolding) for the bis document. >>> >>> Paul >>> >> I have done so, via the issue tracker. >> >> Steve >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trans mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >> > > >
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
