Melinda, We want to keep reaction feature. We have talked extensively with customers who have validated the requirement for privacy. Since we rolled out redaction support several days ago, we have already had hundreds of customers select this option for over 1500 certificates.
Thanks, -Sanjay On 6/16/16, 10:29 PM, "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 6/16/16 4:54 PM, Matt Palmer wrote: >> Even if it's in the initial core spec, browsers still won't necessarily >>pick >> it up. Especially if it's a scheme that's got some pretty serious >>concerns >> against it. Instead, if it gets split out into a separate spec, the >>current >> 6962-bis (sans redaction) can go forward, and the additional time >>needed to >> get a broadly workable redaction mechanism standardised can be taken by >> those who wish redaction to be existent. > >Well, that's the concern (one of them). Leaving aside, for the >moment, the discussion of whether or not it's a good idea, is >there anybody who can say with authority that this is a feature >they want for their own implementation (either in a server or >browser)? > >Thanks, > >Melinda > >_______________________________________________ >Trans mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
