On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:38:06PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > I think the core question here is whether > > publishing 6962-bis without it will make it difficult to specify name > > redaction > > in the future. > > If it's not in the initial core spec, it will not get picked up later by > browsers. My view.
Even if it's in the initial core spec, browsers still won't necessarily pick it up. Especially if it's a scheme that's got some pretty serious concerns against it. Instead, if it gets split out into a separate spec, the current 6962-bis (sans redaction) can go forward, and the additional time needed to get a broadly workable redaction mechanism standardised can be taken by those who wish redaction to be existent. - Matt -- Yes, Java is so bulletproofed that to a C programmer it feels like being in a straightjacket, but it's a really comfy and warm straightjacket, and the world would be a safer place if everyone was straightjacketed most of the time. -- Mark 'Kamikaze' Hughes _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
