On 1/24/17 1:23 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't know if the IETF really has a good way of "This
> is good and important work, has what seems like a lot of good and
> important ideas, but let's keep this on the burner until more
> implementations exist" :(

We really don't, but that's in part why we have an Experimental
track.  Hatless, I would tend to argue in favor of continuing to
progress this towards publication as an experimental standard and
then revving it in the future based on implementation experience.

Melinda


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to