Given there are no implementations, Experimental seems right to
me, and a good way to capture the progress so far.
Cheers - Bill
On 1/24/17 at 6:47 PM, [email protected] (Richard Barnes) wrote:
Without commenting on the substance of the document, process-wise I would
be OK with this as Experimental, if the WG thinks it's worth capturing
state.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
Hatless, I would tend to argue in favor of continuing to progress this
towards
publication as an experimental standard and then revving it in the future
based on implementation experience.
Works for me!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Concurrency is hard. 12 out | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506 | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos,
CA 95032
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
