On 1/31/17 7:10 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > I again ask the Chairs to determine the consensus and advance this document.
We don't have consensus. We're deadlocked and we're not getting sufficient input from the working group to break the deadlock. Paul and I can make a decision on the particular question that's a problem but it probably means an appeal and further delay. That said, we're only deadlocked on one particular item (the description of a conspiring CA attack) and there's been no dissent on the rest of the document. I would think it's safe to use it as the basis for a decision about how to go forward on the issues raised by Richard and EKR, except that I also anticipate that they'll argue that the threat model is incomplete. Frankly, this working group was chartered under the assumption that the goal was detection, not prevention. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
